Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40328641›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2025

Identifying context-specific determinants to inform improvement of antimicrobial stewardship implementation in healthcare facilities in Asia: results from a scoping review and web-based survey among local experts.

Ralalicia Limato, Elza Samantha Elmira, Nguyen Hai Yen, Anh Quan Truong, Duong Hai Yen, Direk Limmathurotsakul, Abhilasha Karkey, Raph L Hamers, Twisha S Patel, Fernanda C Lessa and 4 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ralalicia LimatoFaculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Elza Samantha ElmiraFaculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Nguyen Hai YenOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ha Noi, Viet Nam.
Anh Quan TruongOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ha Noi, Viet Nam.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8462-3410
Duong Hai YenOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ha Noi, Viet Nam.
Direk LimmathurotsakulNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Abhilasha KarkeyOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ha Noi, Viet Nam.
Raph L HamersFaculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Twisha S PatelCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Fernanda C LessaCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Elizabeth Dodds-AshleyDuke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Deverick AndersonDuke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
H Rogier van DoornOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ha Noi, Viet Nam.
Huong VuOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam huongvtl@oucru.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9579-5576

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

International guidelines are available for the assessment and improvement of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes: an important strategy to address the escalating global antimicrobial resistance problem. However, existing AMS assessment tools lack contextual specificity for resource-limited settings, leading to limited applicability in Asia. This project aimed to identify relevant themes from current guidance documents to help develop a context-specific assessment tool that can be applied by healthcare facilities (HCFs) to improve local implementation.We performed a sequential approach of a scoping review to identify relevant assessment themes for Asia and an expert survey for getting feedback on the relevance of assessment stems developed from the scoping review. We reviewed English-language published documents discussing AMS implementation or assessment at HCFs globally and in Asia. Themes were derived through content analysis and classified following the predefined context dimensions to develop assessment stems, defined as containing one identified determinant that may influence implementation outcomes. The survey consisting of identified assessment stems was reviewed by 20 locally identified experts in Asia who rated the level of relevance of these stems in AMS implementation in the region.National leadership, training and technical support, and policy and guidance were the most commonly identified themes among 100 themes identified from 73 reviewed documents. From these themes, we developed 131 assessment stems for the expert survey. Of the 131 assessment stems, 117 (89%) were considered relevant for AMS implementation in Asia by at least 80% of respondents. These stems were included in the process of developing a global AMS assessment tool to support HCFs to improve their programmes.In conclusion, national leadership and support represent a distinct and important aspect affecting AMS implementation in HCFs in Asia. The identified assessment themes have substantial value for the formulation of locally relevant implementation strategies tailored to the Asian context.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial StewardshipHealth FacilitiesAsiaHumansQuality ImprovementSurveys and QuestionnairesAntibiotic managementGlobal HealthImplementation scienceOrganizational CultureQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID40328641
PMCPMC12056646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.