ArticleBritish journal of haematology2025
An international real-world study of primary vitreoretinal lymphoma from the Australasian lymphoma alliance and collaborators.
Article in British journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma: diagnostic and therapeutic insights from a Slovenian population-based study.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2026Article
- Optical coherence tomography features and visual prognosis in vitreoretinal lymphoma: a structured phenotyping study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- An international real-world study of primary vitreoretinal lymphoma from the Australasian lymphoma alliance and collaborators.British journal of haematology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL) is a high-grade extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma, with limited prospective data to inform practice. High rates of central nervous system (CNS) relapse contribute to its poor prognosis. This international multicentre retrospective cohort study aimed to characterise real-world contemporary practice and outcomes in PVRL (2010-2022). Sixty patients were included from 11 centres across Australia, Singapore, Canada and the United Kingdom. Most patients had systemic therapy included in their initial management (63%) either alone or in combination with local therapies; 13% had upfront autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The overall response rate was 78%. With a median follow-up of 68 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 25 months, with a median overall survival (OS) of 73 months. Neither incorporation of systemic therapy into initial treatment nor upfront ASCT demonstrated a statistically significant impact on PFS or OS. The 5-year cumulative incidence of CNS relapse was 33%, with front-line systemic therapy being the only predictive factor for CNS relapse in a multivariate model, hazard ratio of 0.30 (95% CI 0.09-0.98, p = 0.05). Concerning heterogeneity in real-world approaches to diagnosis, staging and management approaches were identified. Further international collaborative efforts are required to address the unmet need in this rare entity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.