ArticleDrug and alcohol review2025
Applying a Modified Version of the Prediction of Alcohol Withdrawal Severity Scale in a Canadian Community Withdrawal Management Setting.
Article in Drug and alcohol review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Applying a Modified Version of the Prediction of Alcohol Withdrawal Severity Scale in a Canadian Community Withdrawal Management Setting.Drug and alcohol review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSevere alcohol withdrawal syndrome (SAWS) can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. The Prediction of Alcohol Withdrawal Severity Scale (PAWSS) has been validated in general acute care environments, but its efficacy in withdrawal management settings remains underexplored. This study aimed to assess the utility of a modified PAWSS and identify appropriate cutoff scores in a community withdrawal management setting in Vancouver, Canada.
methodsFrom October 2019 to September 2022, we reviewed charts at Vancouver Detox Centre. Modified PAWSS versions replaced question 9 on the original PAWSS with: (i) breath analysis readings; (ii) alcohol consumption in the previous 24 h; and (iii) clinical assessments. We performed receiver operating characteristic analysis and used Youden's index to determine modified PAWSS' diagnostic accuracy against SAWS presentation, defined by a score of 15 or greater on the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment Alcohol, Revised, seizures or delirium tremens and/or benzodiazepine administration.
resultsAmong 228 individuals (165 male, 63 female), 175 (75%) met SAWS criteria during admission. For breath analysis readings, an optimal PAWSS cutoff score had 55% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 46%-63%) and 74% specificity (95% CI 54%-87%). For alcohol consumption in the last 24 h, a cutoff score of 7 had 44% sensitivity (95% CI 36%-51%) and 85% specificity (95% CI 70%-93%). For clinical assessment, a cutoff score of 6 had 53% sensitivity (95% CI 45%-61%) and 71% specificity (95% CI 58%-85%). DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsWithin a community withdrawal setting, the prevalence of SAWS was high, rendering the modified PAWSS less valuable. Although higher cutoff scores improved specificity, poor sensitivity hindered identification of low-risk SAWS individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.