ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2025
Accelerated ultrashort echo time quantitative magnetization transfer (UTE-qMT) imaging of macromolecular fraction (MMF) in cortical bone based on a self-attention convolutional neural network.
Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo combine ultrashort echo time quantitative magnetization transfer (UTE-qMT) imaging with a self-attention convolutional neural network (SAT-Net) for accelerated mapping of macromolecular fraction (MMF) in cortical bone. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis institutional review board-approved study involved 31 young female subjects (young control, <45 years) and 50 postmenopausal subjects (6 normal (old control), 14 with osteopenia (osteopenia group), and 30 with osteoporosis (OP group)). After written informed consent was obtained from each subject, 15 UTE-qMT images of the tibial midshaft were acquired with three saturation powers (500°, 1000°, and 1500°) and five frequency offsets (2, 5, 10, 20, and 50 kHz) for each power to estimate the baseline MMF using a two-pool model. The densely connected SAT-Net model was used to predict bone MMF maps based on seven evenly distributed UTE-qMT images, which were well separated in terms of MT powers and frequency offsets (namely 5 and 20 kHz for 500° and 1500°, and 2, 10, 50 kHz for 1000°). Errors relative to the baseline MMF were calculated. Linear regression was used to assess the performance of the SAT-Net model. The mean MMF values for different groups were calculated.
resultsConventional two-pool modeling of seven evenly distributed UTE-qMT input images shows a significant relative error of ∼34 %. In comparison, the SAT-Net model accurately predicted MMF values for the tibial midshafts of 81 human subjects with a high correlation (R
conclusionWhile it is difficult to accelerate MMF mapping in bone using conventional two-pool modeling, the SAT-Net model allows accurate MMF mapping with a substantial reduction in the number of UTE-qMT input images. UTE-qMT with SAT-Net makes clinical evaluation of bone matrix possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.