ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025
A shortcut to sample coverage standardization in metabarcoding data provides new insights into land-use effects on insect diversity.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A shortcut to sample coverage standardization in metabarcoding data provides new insights into land-use effects on insect diversity.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying key drivers of insect diversity decline in the Anthropocene remains a major challenge in biodiversity research. Metabarcoding has rapidly gained popularity for species identification, yet the lack of abundance data complicates accurate diversity metrics like sample coverage-standardized species richness. Additionally, the vast number of taxa lacks a unified phylogeny or trait database. We introduce a new workflow for metabarcoding insect data that constructs a phylogenetic tree for most insect families, standardizes sample coverage and assesses both taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity along the Hill series. Applying this workflow to Central Europe, we analysed insect diversity from 400 families across a land-use gradient. Our results show that land-use intensity significantly affects sample coverage, highlighting the necessity of biodiversity standardization. Taxonomic diversity declined by 27-44% and phylogenetic diversity by 13-29% across 39 000 operational taxonomic units, with diversity decreasing from forests to agricultural areas. When focusing on rare species communities exhibited greater phylogenetic diversity loss than taxonomic diversity, whereas dominant species experienced smaller phylogenetic losses but more pronounced declines in taxonomic diversity. Our findings underscore the detrimental effects of agriculture on insect taxa and reveal a dramatic loss of phylogenetic diversity among rare species with potential consequences for ecosystem stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.