ArticleCurrent biology : CB2025
Translational differentiation of vertically displaced surfaces by grid cells.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Navigation is commonly associated with two-dimensional (2D) representations of space. Recordings from place and grid cells in the rodent and bat brain have largely upheld this association. Recent studies have investigated how these 2D representations might extend into the three-dimensional (3D) world. One unexplored question is whether grid cells represent vertically separated horizontal surfaces as a single 3D space or distinct planar environments. To address this issue, we recorded grid cells as rats foraged in both an open-field environment and one with a transparent floor suspended directly above the open-field environment. Rats either actively locomoted up a ramp to the elevated environment, or they were passively moved between the two environments, to test how differences in path integration may affect grid cell firing. We found that grid cell firing patterns in the elevated environment were translated (but not rotated) relative to those in the floor environment and were consistent across active and passive sessions. The translation of the grid pattern on the elevated surface was consistent among co-recorded grid cells but differed between animals and between different groups of grid cells recorded from the same animal. Non-grid spatially modulated cells also rearranged their location preferences between the two surfaces. Overall, we did not observe any evidence that the two surfaces were represented with a single 3D representation but instead were treated as two distinct surfaces connected by a common orientation signal. These findings suggest that grid cell representations on visually distinct, vertically displaced horizontal surfaces are planar rather than volumetric.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.