Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40327882›Full record

ReviewJMIR medical education2025

Virtual Simulation Tools for Communication Skills Training in Health Care Professionals: Literature Review.

Manuel Fernández-Alcántara, Silvia Escribano, Rocío Juliá-Sanchis, Ana Castillo-López, Antonio Pérez-Manzano, M Macur, Sedina Kalender-Smajlović, Sofía García-Sanjuán, María José Cabañero-Martínez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Manuel Fernández-Alcántara *Department of Health Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3481-8156
Silvia Escribano *Institute of Health and Biomedical Research of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7943-3591
Rocío Juliá-Sanchis *Institute of Health and Biomedical Research of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1086-282X
Ana Castillo-López *3, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, Carretera San Vicente del Raspeig s/n, Alicante, 03690, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7117-1144
Antonio Pérez-Manzano *University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1480-3579
M Macur *Angela Boškin Faculty of Health Care, Spodnji Plavž 3, Jesenice, Slovenia.ORCID 0009-0003-7631-3038
Sedina Kalender-Smajlović *Angela Boškin Faculty of Health Care, Spodnji Plavž 3, Jesenice, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-4472-7044
Sofía García-Sanjuán *Institute of Health and Biomedical Research of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7985-7864
María José Cabañero-Martínez *Institute of Health and Biomedical Research of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8333-2988

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Quality clinical care is supported by effective patient-centered communication. Health care professionals can improve their communication skills through simulation-based training, but our knowledge about virtual simulation and its effectiveness and use in training health professionals and students is still growing rapidly. Objective: The objective of this study was to review the current academic literature to identify and evaluate the virtual simulation tools used to train communication skills in health care students and professionals. Methods: This review was carried out in June 2023 by collecting data from the MEDLINE/PubMed and Web of Science electronic databases. Once applicable studies were identified, we recorded data related to type of technology used, learning objectives, degree of learning autonomy, outcomes, and other details. Results: We found 35 articles that had developed and/or applied a virtual environment for training communication skills aimed at patients, in which 24 different learning tools were identified. Most had been developed to independently train communication skills in English, either generally or in the specific context of medical history (anamnesis) interviews. Many of these tools used a virtual patient that looked like a person and had the ability to vocally respond. Almost half of the tools analyzed allowed the person being trained to respond orally using natural language. Of note, not all these studies described the technology they had used in detail. Conclusions: Many different learning tools with very heterogeneous characteristics are being used for the purposes of communication skills training. Continued research will still be required to develop virtual tools that include the most advanced features to achieve high-fidelity simulation training.

Indexed as

CommunicationHealth PersonnelSimulation TrainingVirtual RealityClinical CompetenceHumanscommunicationcommunication skillshealth care professionalsheterogeneousheterogeneous characteristicsimplementationpatient-centeredpatient-centered communicationskill trainingvirtual patientvirtual simulationvirtual simulation toolvirtual tool

Identifiers

PMID40327882
PMCPMC12074551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.