Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40327875›Full record

ArticleJournal of infusion nursing : the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society

Heat Application to Improve Venous Dilation for Peripheral Intravenous Catheterization in Older Adults: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

Kae Yasuda, Inaho Shishido, Chiyomi Matsuno, Rika Yano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of infusion nursing : the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kae YasudaAuthor Affiliations: Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan (Yasuda, Shishido, and Yano); Institute for Integrated Innovations, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan (Yasuda); School of Nursing, Sapporo City University, Hokkaido, Japan (Matsuno).
Inaho Shishido
Chiyomi Matsuno
Rika Yano

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The failure rate of peripheral intravenous catheterization is higher in older adults than in younger adults. Safe peripheral intravenous catheterization requires the veins to be fully dilated to improve palpation. Heat application has been empirically recognized as an effective venous dilation technique. However, evidence is lacking regarding the venous dilation effect of heat application in older adults with degenerated venous walls and impaired endothelial function due to aging. This study aimed to verify the venous dilation effect of heat application before tourniquet use in comparison with tourniquet application in hospitalized older adults (n = 88; mean age: 79.3 ± 8.1 years). Participants underwent 2 conditions on the same day in sequence: the control condition (using a tourniquet) and the heat application condition (applying a hot pack at 40 ± 2 °C for 7 minutes followed by tourniquet use). Measurements pre- and post-intervention included venous diameter, depth, and assessment scores (palpability and visibility). Heat application significantly increased venous diameter, reduced depth, and improved palpability and visibility compared to the control. Additionally, venous palpability improved with heat application in half of the patients whose veins were not palpable after tourniquet application alone. Therefore, heat application is recommended to assess the suitable veins for catheterization in older adults.

Indexed as

Catheterization, PeripheralHot TemperatureVeinsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleTourniquetsheatingnursingolder adultsperipheral intravenous catheterizationvenous dilatation

Identifiers

PMID40327875
PMCPMC12599510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.