Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40327861›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2025

Trust and Privacy Concerns Among Cancer Survivors Who Did Not Visit a Research Website Offering Free Genetic Counseling Services for Families: Survey Study.

James A Shepperd, Colleen M McBride, Weihua An, Jingsong Zhao, Rebecca D Pentz, Cam Escoffery, Kevin Ward, Yue Guan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04927013 (Testing a Low Cost Population- and Theory-Based Outreach Intervention to Engage Ovarian Cancer Survivors and Their Close Relatives to Consider Genetic Services), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04927013 nacompletednot on this map

Testing a Low Cost Population- and Theory-Based Outreach Intervention to Engage Ovarian Cancer Survivors and Their Close Relatives to Consider Genetic Services

TypeinterventionalSponsorEmory UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled2,331ConditionsOvarian CancerArmsMessage-based Outreach Intervention for Survivors, Standard Outreach for Survivors, Message-based Outreach Intervention for Close Relatives, Standard Outreach for Close Relatives
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Strategies to promote the dissemination of psychosocial digital health resources for those affected by cancer: scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

James A ShepperdDepartment of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5329-6760
Colleen M McBrideDepartment of Behavioral, Social and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6061-9815
Weihua AnDepartment of Sociology and Department of Quantitative Theory and Methods, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0334-2930
Jingsong ZhaoDepartment of Behavioral, Social and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0409-6164
Rebecca D PentzWinship Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4338-6663
Cam EscofferyDepartment of Behavioral, Social and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4445-009X
Kevin WardDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5893-6192
Yue GuanDepartment of Behavioral, Social and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6377-4626

Funding

Winship Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA138292 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Ragini Reiney Kudchadkar · 2009 to 2026
$47.5M
Testing a Low Cost Population- and Theory-Based Outreach Intervention to Engage Ovarian Cancer Survivors and their Close Relatives to Consider Genetic ServicesU01CA240581 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GUAN, YUE · 2020 to 2023
$2.6M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006377NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800003CNCI NIH HHS P30 CA138292NCI NIH HHS U01 CA240581
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital health tools, such as websites, now proliferate to assist individuals in managing their health. With user input, we developed the Your Family Connects (YFC) website to promote access to genetic services for survivors of ovarian cancer and their relatives. Although we estimated that half or more would access the website, only 18% of invited survivors did so. We assessed the extent to which perceived relevance of the information provided, trust, and privacy concerns influenced decisions not to access the website.

objectiveWe designed a theory-based cross-sectional survey to explore the following questions: (1) To what extent did nonresponders endorse privacy concerns? (2) Were privacy concerns associated with recall of receiving the website invitation, time since diagnosis, age, and race? (3) Could we identify profiles of nonresponders that would guide the development of future interventions to encourage engagement in health websites for families affected by inherited cancers?

methodsA sample of survivors who were eligible to access the website yet did not respond to the study invitation was identified by linking study IDs to the Georgia Cancer Registry information. The survey was brief and contained 27 items, including recall of the invitation, interest in ovarian cancer information, benefits of using health websites, trust in health websites, and trust in university-based health research. We conducted factor analyses, regression analyses, ANOVA, correlation analyses, and logistic regression to address research questions.

resultsOf the 650 nonresponders to whom we sent the short survey, 368 (56.3%) responded and provided sufficient data for analysis. The mean response of 2.57 on the trust scale was significantly below the scale midpoint of 3 (t

conclusionsThe nonresponders in the present study-particularly the White nonresponders-were skeptical of website platforms regardless of whether they recalled receiving a website invitation or not. Social marketing approaches geared toward building trust in web platforms by building a relationship with an information consumer and in collaboration with trusted organizations warrant further investigation.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04927013; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04927013.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingInternetOvarian NeoplasmsPrivacySurvivorsTrustAdultAgedCancer SurvivorsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedhereditary cancersinternet privacyinternet trustpatients and relatives outreachsocial marketing

Identifiers

PMID40327861
PMCPMC12093066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.