Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40327856›Full record

Observational studyJMIR aging2025

Factors Influencing Older Adults' Perception of the Age-Friendliness of Their Environment and the Impact of Loneliness, Technology Use, and Mobility: Quantitative Analysis.

Eric Balki, Niall Hayes, Carol Holland

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JMIR aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eric BalkiDepartment of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5404-7187
Niall HayesKeyworth Building, Leeds University, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8718-4671
Carol HollandDepartment of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7109-6554

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization's (WHO) publication on age-friendly environments (AFEs) imagines future cities to become more age-friendly to harness the latent potential of older adults, especially those who have restricted mobility. AFE has important implications for older adults in maintaining social connections, independence, and successful aging-in-place. However, technology is notably absent in the 8 intersecting domains of AFEs that the WHO imagines improve older adult well-being, and we investigated whether technology should form a ninth domain. While mobility was severely restricted, the COVID-19 pandemic provided an opportunity to test how older adults' perceptions of their AFE changed and what role technology was playing.

objectiveThis study examined how life-space mobility (LSM), a concept for assessing patterns of functional mobility over time, and loneliness impacted perceived AFEs and the moderating effect of technology. It also explores whether technology should play a greater role as the ninth domain of the WHO's imagination of the AFE of the future.

methodsIn this cross-sectional quantitative observation study, data from 92 older adults aged 65-89 years were collected in England from March 2020 to June 2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Life-space Questionnaire, Technology Experience Questionnaire, UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) Loneliness Scale, and age-friendly environment assessment tool were used. Correlation and moderation analyses were used to investigate relationships between variables.

resultsMost participants (86/92, 93%) had not left their immediate town in the previous 4 weeks before the interview. Restricted LSM was positively correlated to the age-friendly environment assessment tool, that is, rising physical isolation was linked to a better perception of AFEs; however, we discovered this result was due to the moderating impact of increased use of technology, and that restricted LSM actually had a negative effect on AFEs. Loneliness was correlated negatively with the perception of AFEs, but technology use was found to moderate the impact of loneliness.

conclusionsPandemic-related LSM restrictions impacted perceived AFEs and loneliness negatively, but technology played a moderating role. The findings demonstrate that technology could be considered as a ninth domain in the WHO's assessment of AFEs for older adults and that there is a need for its explicit acknowledgment.

Indexed as

AgingCOVID-19Independent LivingLonelinessTechnologyAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleHumansMalePandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnairesadult well-beingAFEATage friendliness of environmentsage-friendliness of environmentsage-friendly environment assessment toolaging in placeCOVID-19cross-sectionaldigital communication technologiesfunctional mobilitylife-space mobilitylonelinessLSEolder adultsphysical isolationreduced mobilitysocial connectionsUCLA loneliness scaleWHOWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID40327856
PMCPMC12093072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.