ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Wearable Artificial Intelligence for Sleep Disorders: Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Sleep Bruxism Detection: A Technical Pipeline Synthesis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Exercise-induced neuropeptidergic and neurochemical neuroadaptation in stress regulation and emotional disorders.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2026Review
- Human-Centered AI in Sleep Health Management: Scoping Review of Stakeholder Perspectives and Co-Design Practices.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Suicide and Sleep Disorders: The Role of Insomnia, Nightmares, and Circadian Disruption.Cureus · 2026Review
- Overcoming Data Loss in Wearable Disease Detection with GAN-Based Imputation.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Personalized Machine Learning Intervention to Improve Sleep Quality Using Wearable Technology in Healthy Middle-Aged Adults From Mexico City: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Within-person modeling of postprandial glucose using multimodal wearable data.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Can weekend catch-up sleep repay the sleep debt? Balancing short-term relief with long-term risks.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2025Review
- PDSRS-LD: Personalized Deep Learning-Based Sleep Recommendation System Using Lifelog Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Sleep Disorders in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Developmental Impact and Intervention Strategies.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Sensors, technologies, and classification algorithms for monitoring and diagnosis of sleep apnea.Digital healthReview
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWorldwide, 30%-45% of adults have sleep disorders, which are linked to major health issues such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Long-term monitoring with traditional in-lab testing is impractical due to high costs. Wearable artificial intelligence (AI)-powered solutions offer accessible, scalable, and continuous monitoring, improving the identification and treatment of sleep problems.
objectiveThis scoping review aims to provide an overview of AI-powered wearable devices used for sleep disorders, focusing on study characteristics, wearable technology features, and AI methodologies for detection and analysis.
methodsSeven electronic databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, Google Scholar, and Scopus) were searched for peer-reviewed literature published before March 2024. Keywords were selected based on 3 domains: sleep disorders, AI, and wearable devices. The primary selection criterion was the inclusion of studies that utilized AI algorithms to detect or predict various sleep disorders using data from wearable devices. Study selection was conducted in 2 steps: first, by reviewing titles and abstracts, followed by full-text screening. Two reviewers independently conducted study selection and data extraction, resolving discrepancies by consensus. The extracted data were synthesized using a narrative approach.
resultsThe initial search yielded 615 articles, of which 46 met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final analysis. The majority of studies focused on sleep apnea. Wearable AI was widely deployed for diagnosing and screening disorders; however, none of the studies used it for treatment. Commercial devices were the most commonly used type of wearable technology, appearing in 30 out of 46 (65%) studies. Among these, various brands were utilized rather than a single large, well-known brand; 19 (41%) studies used wrist-worn devices. Respiratory data were used by 25 of 46 (54%) studies as the primary data for model development, followed by heart rate (22/46, 48%) and body movement (17/46, 37%). The most popular algorithm was the convolutional neural network, adopted by 17 of 46 (37%) studies, followed by random forest (14/46, 30%) and support vector machines (12/46, 26%).
conclusionsWearable AI technology offers promising solutions for sleep disorders. These devices can be used for screening and diagnosis; however, research on wearable technology for sleep disorders other than sleep apnea remains limited. To statistically synthesize performance and efficacy results, more reviews are needed. Technology companies should prioritize advancements such as deep learning algorithms and invest in wearable AI for treating sleep disorders, given its potential. Further research is necessary to validate machine learning techniques using clinical data from wearable devices and to develop useful analytics for data collection, monitoring, prediction, classification, and recommendation in the context of sleep disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.