ArticlePloS one2025
Protocol for developing a Consolidated Checklist for Reporting Mixed Methods Research (CORMIX) using modified Delphi.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMixed methods research has gained popularity across healthcare and social sciences. However, inconsistent, and inadequate reporting remains a concern, hindering the assessment and utilization of mixed methods studies. Comprehensive easy-to-use mixed methods reporting standards are lacking. This protocol outlines the development of the COnsolidated Checklist for Reporting Mixed Methods Research (CORMIX) to address this gap.
methodsFollowing the EQUATOR Network guidelines, the protocol involves conducting a scoping review to identify potential checklist items from current reporting guidelines and existing literature. This will be followed by executing a modified Delphi with a panel of experts in mixed methods research for further refinement through consensus. The modified Delphi will include ≥40 purposively selected experts who have extensively utilized and published mixed methods research. A questionnaire compiling literature-derived reporting items will be validated and distributed in successive rounds until consensus is reached on all items. Consensus is defined as ≥ 85% of experts agreeing on the inclusion of an item. Following the finalization of the checklist, a user guide and justification document will be completed. DISCUSSION: This rigorous development process conforms with EQUATOR Network standards for health reporting tools. CORMIX has the potential to enhance the quality, consistency, and transparency of mixed methods reporting. Clear reporting is essential for assessing validity, replicating studies, and enabling synthesis and application of mixed methods evidence. The protocol is currently registered with the EQUATOR network: CORMIX - COnsolidated Checklist for Reporting Mixed-Methods Research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.