Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40327686›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Unravelling the tapestry: Cross-cultural insights into intelligence and creativity.

Vlada Alekseevna Repeykova, Anatoliy Vladimirovich Kharkhurin, Sergey Rostislavovich Yagolkovskiy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vlada Alekseevna RepeykovaDepartment of Psychology, HSE University. Moscow, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9718-3103
Anatoliy Vladimirovich KharkhurinDepartment of Psychology, HSE University. Moscow, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5970-5003
Sergey Rostislavovich YagolkovskiyDepartment of Psychology, HSE University. Moscow, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1851-0725

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Literature suggests multiple relationships between creativity and intelligence, each supported and contradicted by empirical evidence. The current study investigated cultural variations in the relationship between divergent thinking (DT) and fluid intelligence (Gf). Study participants were students from the most reputable universities in Russia (N = 53) and the United Arab Emirates (UAE; N = 53). The DT test measured their creative potential, the Abbreviated Torrance Test for Adults (ATTA), from which five indicators were extracted for further analyses: composite Creativity Index (CI), fluency, originality, elaboration, and flexibility. The Culture Fair Intelligence Test (CFIT) assessed participants' Gf. We found a significant negative relationship between Gf score and CI, fluency, elaboration, and flexibility. The results suggest a non-linear trend, which was addressed accordingly. Adding a cultural component into the model explained substantial variance in DT and Gf scores. The Russian sample outperformed the UAE sample on all DT components, while the UAE sample outperformed the Russian sample on the Gf. Samples were different, predominantly on the fluency component, and were more similar in originality. Overall, results suggest the complex interplay between DT and Gf in cross-cultural settings.

Indexed as

CreativityCross-Cultural ComparisonIntelligenceAdultFemaleHumansMaleRussiaUnited Arab EmiratesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40327686
PMCPMC12054861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.