ReviewPloS one2025
Behavioural analysis of factors influencing prescribing for neurodegenerative diseases: A rapid review.
Review in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe incidence and prevalence of neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) are growing worldwide. In an environment where healthcare resources are already stretched, it is important to optimise treatment choice to help alleviate healthcare burden. This rapid review aims to consolidate evidence on factors that influence healthcare professionals (HCPs) to prescribe medication for NDs and map them to theoretical models of behaviour change to identify the behavioural determinants that may support in optimising prescribing. METHODS AND
findingsEmbase and Ovid MEDLINE were used to identify relevant empirical research studies. Screening, data extraction and quality assessment were carried out by three independent reviewers to ensure consistency. Factors influencing prescribing were mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and key behavioural determinants were described using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation - Behaviour (COM-B) model. An initial 3,099 articles were identified, of which 53 were included for data extraction. Fifty-six factors influencing prescribing were identified and categorised into patient, HCP or healthcare system groups, then mapped to TDF and COM-B domains. Prescribing was influenced by capability of HCPs, namely factors mapped to decision making (e.g., patient age or symptom burden) and knowledge (e.g., clinical understanding) behavioural domains. However, most factors were influenced by HCP opportunity, underpinned by factors mapped to social (e.g., prescribing support or culture) and contextual (e.g., lack of resources or medication availability) domains. Less evidence was available on factors influencing the motivation of HCPs, where evident; factors primarily related to HCP belief about consequences (e.g., side effects) and professional identify (e.g., level of specialism) were often described.
conclusionsThis systematic analysis of the literature provides an in-depth understanding of the behavioural determinants that may support in optimising prescribing practices (e.g., drug costs or pressure from patients' family members). Understanding these approaches provides an opportunity to identify relevant intervention functions and behaviour change techniques to target the factors that directly influence HCP prescribing behaviour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.