Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40327663›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2025

Did a digital quality of life (QOL) assessment and practice support system in home health care improve the QOL of older adults living with life-limiting conditions and of their family caregivers? A mixed-methods pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Richard Sawatzky, Kara Schick-Makaroff, Pamela A Ratner, Jae-Yung Kwon, David G T Whitehurst, Joakim Öhlén, Alies Maybee, Kelli Stajduhar, Lisa Zetes-Zanatta, S Robin Cohen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02940951 (Integrating a Quality of Life Assessment and Practice Support System in Home Care Services for Older Adults With Chronic Life-limiting Illness and Their Families), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02940951 nacompletednot on this map

Integrating a Quality of Life Assessment and Practice Support System in Home Care Services for Older Adults With Chronic Life-limiting Illness and Their Families

TypeinterventionalSponsorTrinity Western UniversityRan2018 to 2021Enrolled565ConditionsChronic Disease, Life-limiting Illness, Palliative CareArmsQPSS, Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Richard SawatzkySchool of Nursing, Trinity Western University, Langley, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8042-190X
Kara Schick-MakaroffFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Pamela A RatnerSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jae-Yung KwonSchool of Nursing & Institute on Aging and Lifelong Health, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia BC, Canada.
David G T WhitehurstFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Joakim ÖhlénInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, and Centre for Person-Centered Care (GPCC), Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Alies MaybeeIndependent patient partner.
Kelli StajduharSchool of Nursing & Institute on Aging and Lifelong Health, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2381-4712
Lisa Zetes-ZanattaKamloops Community Programs and Surgical Services Network, Interior Health Authority, Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada.
S Robin CohenDepartments of Oncology and Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2153-8486

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to improve the quality of life (QOL) of homecare patients (≥ 55 years of age) who had chronic life-limiting conditions and that of their family caregivers by making QOL assessment data available via a digital QOL and practice support system (QPSS). We hypothesized that access to QPSS data in home health care would result in improved QOL for patients or their family caregivers. We further sought to understand how to integrate the use of QOL information into home health care. Our mixed-methods study, including a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (PrCT; registered at ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02940951), was conducted with nine home healthcare teams in Canadian urban areas. The qualitative research included focus groups and interviews with home healthcare teams (N = 118) to determine how to integrate the QPSS into their practice. Participating homecare patients were assigned to an intervention group (N = 166), where home healthcare teams had access to patients' and their family caregivers' QOL data via the QPSS, or a usual care group (N = 165). Where possible, one family caregiver per patient was recruited (intervention N = 62; usual care N = 51). Primary outcomes, measured every two months for one year, were patients' and family caregivers' QOL trajectories. Longitudinal structural equation models were used to compare the trajectories. The home healthcare teams preferred to have QOL scores presented as tables and graphs, with family caregivers' data linked to each patient. Despite the enthusiasm expressed by the home healthcare teams, and efforts to satisfy their preferences, they infrequently accessed the QOL information. While we observed substantial individual-level variability in patients' and family caregivers' QOL trajectories, the average trajectories for the PrCT groups were similar. Making QOL assessment data available via a digital platform may not be sufficient to achieve measurable improvements for patients and family caregivers.

Indexed as

CaregiversHome Care ServicesQuality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overCanadaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID40327663
PMCPMC12054893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.