Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40327536›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Quantifying feral pig interactions to inform disease transmission networks.

Tatiana Proboste, Abigail Turnlund, Andrew Bengsen, Matthew Gentle, Cameron Wilson, Lana Harriott, Richard A Fuller, Darren Marshall, Ricardo J Soares-Magalhaes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tatiana ProbosteSchool of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5274-7179
Abigail TurnlundThe University of Queensland, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, Australian Centre for Ecogenomics, Brisbane, Australia.
Andrew BengsenNSW Department of Primary Industries, Vertebrate Pest Research Unit, Orange, Australia.
Matthew GentlePest Animal Research Centre, Biosecurity Queensland, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Toowoomba, Australia.
Cameron WilsonPest Animal Research Centre, Biosecurity Queensland, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Toowoomba, Australia.
Lana HarriottPest Animal Research Centre, Biosecurity Queensland, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Toowoomba, Australia.
Richard A FullerSchool of the Environment, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Darren MarshallCentre for Invasive Species Solutions, S. Bruce Australian Capital Territory, Bruce, Australia.
Ricardo J Soares-MagalhaesSchool of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 2008937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feral pigs threaten biodiversity in 54 countries and cause an estimated $120 billion in damages annually in the USA. They endanger over 600 native species and have driven 14 to extinction. Additionally, they pose a significant zoonotic disease risk, carrying pathogens such as Brucella, leptospirosis, and Japanese encephalitis. Understanding and controlling disease spread relies on models of social dynamics, but these vary widely across regions, limiting the transferability of findings from the USA and Europe to other locations like Australia. This study addresses this gap by analysing the social interactions of 146 GPS-tracked feral pigs in Australia using a proximity-based social network approach. Findings reveal that females exhibit stronger group cohesion, while males act as key connectors between groups. Contact rates are high within groups, facilitating rapid intra-group disease spread, whereas inter-group transmission is slower. Seasonal variations further impact dynamics, with increased contact in summer. These insights suggest that targeting adult males in control programs could help limit disease outbreaks. Given the rising economic and public health concerns associated with animal diseases, the study highlights the need for localized strategies based on feral pig social behaviour to enhance global control efforts.

Indexed as

Animals, WildSwine DiseasesZoonosesAnimalsAustraliaFemaleMaleSocial BehaviorSwineaustraliacontact ratedisease modelingecologyferal pigsnetwork analysissus scrofa

Identifiers

PMID40327536
PMCPMC12054999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.