ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
Algebraic differentiation for fast sensitivity analysis of optimal flux modes in metabolic models.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Seasonal and spatial assessment of aquatic pollution in the Mediterranean crab Callinectes sapidus.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationSensitivity analysis is a useful tool to identify key parameters in metabolic models. It is typically only applied to the growth rate, disregarding the sensitivity of other solution variables to parameters. Further, sensitivity analysis of elementary flux modes could provide low-dimensional insights into optimal solutions, but they are not defined when a model is subject to inhomogeneous flux constraints, such as the frequently used ATP maintenance reaction.
resultsWe introduce optimal flux modes (OFMs), an analogue to elementary flux modes (EFMs), but specifically applied to optimal solutions of constraint-based models. Further, we prove that implicit differentiation can always be used to efficiently calculate the sensitivities of both whole-model solutions and OFM-based solutions to model parameters. This allows for fine-grained sensitivity analysis of the optimal solution, and investigation of how these parameters exert control on the optimal composition of OFMs. This novel framework is implemented in DifferentiableMetabolism.jl, a software package designed to efficiently differentiate solutions of constraint-based models. To demonstrate scalability, we differentiate solutions of 342 yeast models; additionally we show that sensitivities of specific subsystems can guide metabolic engineering. Applying our scheme to an Escherichia coli model, we find that OFM sensitivities predict the effect of knockout experiments on waste product accumulation. Sensitivity analysis of OFMs also provides key insights into metabolic changes resulting from parameter perturbations. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Software introduced here is available as open-source Julia packages DifferentiableMetabolism.jl (https://github.com/stelmo/DifferentiableMetabolism.jl) and ElementaryFluxModes.jl (https://github.com/HettieC/ElementaryFluxModes.jl), which both work on all major operating systems and computer architectures. Code to reproduce all results is available from https://github.com/HettieC/DifferentiableOFMPaper, and as an archive from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15183208.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.