ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2025
Effectiveness and Implementation Outcomes of an mHealth App Aimed at Promoting Physical Activity and Improving Psychological Distress in the Workplace Setting: Cluster-Level Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.
Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of mHealth Interventions on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Among Office Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2026Pooled it
- An mHealth Intervention Promoting Physical Activity to Reduce Psychological Distress Among Workers: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Trial
- Supporting the health of working women in midlife: co-designing and testing the acceptability of a digital exercise programme.BMC women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Encouraging physical activity improves mental health and is recommended in workplace mental health guidelines. Although mobile health (mHealth) interventions are promising for physical activity promotion, their impact on mental health outcomes is inconsistent. Furthermore, poor user retention rates of mHealth apps pose a major challenge. Objective: This study aimed to examine the effectiveness and implementation outcomes of the smartphone app ASHARE in Japanese workplace settings, leveraging a deep learning model to monitor depression and anxiety through physical activity. Methods: This hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial was a 3-month nonrandomized controlled trial conducted from October 2023 to September 2024. Work units and employees were recruited and allocated to the intervention or active control group based on preference. The intervention group installed the ASHARE app, whereas the control group participated in an existing multicomponent workplace program promoting physical activity. Changes in physical activity and psychological distress levels were compared between the groups. User retention rates, participation rates, acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, satisfaction, and potential harm were also assessed. Results: A total of 84 employees from 7 work units participated (67 from 5 units in the intervention group and 17 from 2 units in the control group). In total, 78 employees completed the 3-month follow-up survey (follow-up rate: 93%). Both groups showed increased physical activity, and the intervention group showed reduced psychological distress; however, the differences between groups were not statistically significant (P=.20; P=.36). In a sensitivity analysis of protocol-compliant employees (n=21), psychological distress levels were significantly reduced in the intervention group compared with the control group (coefficient=-3.68, SE 1.65; P=.03). The app's 3-month user retention rate was 20% (12/61), which was lower than the participation rate in each component of the control programs. Implementation outcomes evaluated by employees were less favorable in the intervention group than in the control group, whereas health promotion managers found them to be similar. Conclusions: The ASHARE app did not show superior effectiveness compared with an existing multicomponent workplace program for promoting physical activity. An implementation gap may exist between health promotion managers and employees, possibly contributing to the app's low user retention rate. Future research should focus on examining the effectiveness of strategies to get engagement from managers and from segments of employees with favorable responses in the workplace at an early stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.