ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Integrating machine learning and genetic evidence to uncover novel gene biomarkers for colorectal cancer diagnosis.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interferon-induced transmembrane (IFITM) proteins at the tumour-immune interface: A four-axis framework for their context-dependent roles.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Review
- IFITM1-targeted NIR-II fluorescence imaging enables visualisation of colorectal cancer and metastatic lymph nodes.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Claudin-1 Interacts with CD81 and Promotes the Progression of Colorectal Cancer.Oncology research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
From 2020 to 2022, colorectal cancer (CRC) cases increased, making it the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Early detection remains a significant challenge due to the lack of reliable diagnostic biomarkers. This study aimed to develop a robust gene diagnostic model for CRC using publicly available databases, such as GEO and GEPIA2. The approach integrated differential expression analysis, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), and the application of 113 machine learning combinations derived from 12 algorithms. The most effective model was then validated using independent datasets, which included analyses such as Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, along with assessments of immune infiltration and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging. Notably, the glmBoost + RF algorithm identified an eight-gene diagnostic model with high precision, pinpointing key genes such as CLDN1, IFITM1, and FOXQ1, which exhibited strong diagnostic performance (AUC > 0.9). Furthermore, Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis suggested that IFITM1 may be a potential causal gene for CRC, with significant associations to immune cell profiles and established roles in immune regulation and tumor progression. Collectively, these findings highlight IFITM1, SCGN, and FOXQ1 as promising early diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for CRC, laying a foundation for future research focused on enhancing early detection and intervention strategies in colorectal cancer management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.