ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2025
An adaptive segmentation scheme based on recurring action potentials for sEMG controlled movement decoding.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An electromyography (EMG) controlled decoding system requires signal pre-processing, feature extraction, and classification as fundamental steps and requires high accuracy and minimum delay. The conventional system relies on the constant width segmentation scheme for feature extraction, which does not cover the complexities associated with the random behavior of EMG signals. An adaptive segmentation based on the repeating patterns of action potentials can be a promising solution. This work proposes a novel adaptive segmentation approach that captures the occurrence of these action potentials for segmentation and feature extraction. The proposed work is validated experimentally with 12 subjects performing eight different movements. Twenty-time domain features are extracted to verify the study. Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), k-nearest neighbor (kNN), and Decision Tree (DT) classifiers are used to observe the performance of the proposed scheme in terms of precision, recall, F1 score, and accuracy. The proposed method gives an average segmentation width of 124 ms across all subjects with 124 ± 5.4 (± 4.35 %) margin of error at 95 % confidence level. The average F1 score across all subjects for eight movements is 82.078 % for LDA, 81.51 % for kNN, and 80.81 % for DT classifiers. The 5-fold cross-validated accuracies for LDA, kNN, and DT classifiers are 78.3 %, 78.2 %, and 76.70 %, respectively. The calculated accuracies are compared with a constant width segmentation scheme with a window size of 200 ms. The t-test suggests significant improvement in the performance of the classifiers with the proposed method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40327236What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.