Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40327214›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2025

Sex- and age-related differences in LPS-induced lung injury: establishing a mouse intensive care unit.

Chantal Crispens, Emilia Fleckenstein, Annett Wilken-Schmitz, Sandra Weber, Michael Gröger, Andrea Hoffmann, Peter Radermacher, Lucy Kathleen Reiss, Steven R Talbot, Laura Kästner and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Chantal Crispens *Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Goethe University, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Emilia Fleckenstein *Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Goethe University, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Annett Wilken-SchmitzDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Goethe University, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Sandra WeberInstitute for Anesthesiological Pathophysiology and Process Engineering, Ulm University, Helmholtzstrasse 8-1, Ulm, Germany.
Michael GrögerInstitute for Anesthesiological Pathophysiology and Process Engineering, Ulm University, Helmholtzstrasse 8-1, Ulm, Germany.
Andrea HoffmannInstitute for Anesthesiological Pathophysiology and Process Engineering, Ulm University, Helmholtzstrasse 8-1, Ulm, Germany.
Peter RadermacherInstitute for Anesthesiological Pathophysiology and Process Engineering, Ulm University, Helmholtzstrasse 8-1, Ulm, Germany.
Lucy Kathleen ReissDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, RWTH Aachen University, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Steven R TalbotHannover Medical School, Institute for Laboratory Animal Science, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Laura KästnerInstitute of Veterinary Pathology, Justus Liebig University, Frankfurter Str. 96, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Kernt KöhlerInstitute of Veterinary Pathology, Justus Liebig University, Frankfurter Str. 96, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Kai ZacharowskiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Goethe University, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Andreas von KnethenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Goethe University, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Ulrike HeinickeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Goethe University, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. heinicke@med.uni-frankfurt.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0016-8124

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMouse models are widely used to establish new therapy concepts for acute lung injury, but the transfer of therapeutic approaches into the intensive care unit often failed. To establish a mouse intensive care unit to adequately reflect the patient's situation and to investigate sex- and age-related differences in response to lipopolysaccharide.

methodsFor the establishment of a mouse intensive care unit, young (2-3 months) and old (15-18 months) mice of both sexes received continuous respiratory and cardiovascular monitoring for 6 h. Mimicking an acute lung injury by intratracheal lipopolysaccharide stimulation for 6 or 24 h, the impact of sex and age on survival and physiological parameters was evaluated.

resultsThe establishment revealed sex- and age-related differences in physiological responses during mechanical ventilation, with old males requiring more noradrenaline to maintain stable hemodynamics. While young mice, irrespective of sex, developed acute lung injury 24 h after lipopolysaccharide administration, old mice exhibited a rapid systemic response, showing signs of lactic acidosis and endotoxemia. Among these, old females had the highest mortality risk, whereas in old males, mechanical ventilation provided effective support, contributing to improved survival outcomes.

conclusionsWe successfully established a mouse intensive care unit that integrated all critical aspects of a human intensive care unit simultaneously. By highlighting sex- and age-related differences following lipopolysaccharide stimulation and mechanical ventilation, our study underscored the need for diversity in preclinical models to improve translation of findings on critical illnesses like acute lung injury into clinical settings.

Indexed as

Acute lung injuryCritical careLipopolysaccharideMechanical ventilationRespiratory diseases

Identifiers

PMID40327214
PMCPMC12055714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.