ArticleEJNMMI physics2025
Transfer learning‑based attenuation correction in
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDopamine transporter (DAT) SPECT is an effective tool for early Parkinson's disease (PD) detection and heavily hampered by attenuation. Attenuation correction (AC) is the most important correction among other corrections. Transfer learning (TL) with fine-tuning (FT) a pre-trained model has shown potential in enhancing deep learning (DL)-based AC methods. In this study, we investigate leveraging realistic Monte Carlo (MC) simulation data to create a pre-trained model for TL-based AC (TLAC) to improve AC performance for DAT SPECT.
methodsA total number of 200 digital brain phantoms with realistic
resultsWith 8 available clinical datasets, TLAC-MC achieved the best result in Normalized Mean Squared Error (NMSE) and Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM) (TLAC-MC; NMSE = 0.0143 ± 0.0082/SSIM = 0.9355 ± 0.0203), followed by DLAC-AUG, DLAC-MIX, TLAC-ANA, DLAC-CLI, DLAC-MC, ChangAC and NAC. Similar trends exist when increasing the number of clinical datasets. For TL-based AC methods, the fewer clinical datasets available for FT, the greater the improvement as compared to DLAC-CLI using the same number of clinical datasets for training. Joint histograms analysis and Bland-Altman plots of SBR results also demonstrate consistent findings.
conclusionTLAC is feasible for DAT SPECT with a pre-trained model generated purely based on simulation data. TLAC-MC demonstrates superior performance over other DL-based AC methods, particularly when limited clinical datasets are available. The closer the pre-training data is to the target domain, the better the performance of the TLAC model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.