ArticleJournal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection2025
Subconjunctival dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex
Article in Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo report a case series of non-infectious anterior scleritis resistant to multiple lines of conventional therapies which were eventually successfully treated with off-label subconjunctival dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex
methodsA retrospective case series of 4 patients (6 eyes).
resultsIn the index case series, the patients had a mean age of 57.2 years (range 36 to 82 years, SD 19.2 years) with 50% being female. Two patients had underlying autoimmune diseases: rheumatoid arthritis (n = 1), and granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) (n = 1). The other patients were diagnosed with idiopathic anterior scleritis after extensive systemic investigations (n = 2). The mean follow-up duration and the mean number of concomitant therapies prior to SDI was 27 (SD 17.7) months and 2 (SD 0.81), respectively. In all patients, symptom resolution and significant improvement in disease activity were achieved after SDI, persisting for an extended period following the resorption of the implant. No scleral melt, infection or ocular hypertension were noted following SDI.
conclusionSDI may be a safe and effective therapeutic option for resistant non-infectious anterior scleritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.