ReviewNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025
Brain donation rules in Italy and worldwide: overview of a cutting-edge topic for human brain research.
Review in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next generation open access visualization of neuroanatomy through 3D modeling and 3D printing.Anatomical sciences education · 2026Review
- Brain banking for research: can we achieve efficient banking?Frontiers in neurologyArticle
- An Australian brain bank and the future of alcohol and major neuropsychiatric disorders research.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuropathological examination of the brain and its biochemical analyses are fundamental to neuroscience studies and public health decisions, but are dependent on the effectiveness of regulations and operational protocols. The article discusses opportunities and limits of Italian regulation on body donation in relation to the specific requirements of neuropathology and brain sciences, in comparison with the regulations of other countries. Some crucial issues emerge, widely shared in the various regulatory contexts. The main aspect is the willingness to donate, consciously expressed by the subject by signing an informed consent or through the formulation of advanced directives. The donation of a single organ, the brain in particular, does not necessarily imply the donation of the entire body, which should be considered separately. In the specific case of the brain, particular attention is given to reducing the post-mortem interval, in order to obtain tissues suitable for research. Consequently, the centres that deal with the brain and brain banking must have experience and expertise in handling nervous tissue, and do not necessarily have to deal with the management of the entire body. These aspects, still little addressed in Italy, are the basis to develop an effective brain banking activity, which can only develop by integrating post-mortem body donation with specific rules for brain banking without which Italian neuroscience will be penalised in the coming years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.