ArticleWorld journal of urology2025
Postoperative management with a single scheduled outpatient appointment following penile prosthesis placement does not create undue healthcare system burden.
Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOptimization of preoperative counselling and postoperative care pathways to maximize patient satisfaction and healthcare system efficiency requires an understanding of healthcare system interactions that result from postoperative patient concerns. We sought to identify patterns of healthcare utilization following inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) placement in patients managed with a single scheduled postoperative appointment.
methodsA single-center retrospective chart review of 190 patients undergoing IPP placement or three-component revision was performed. Demographic information, intraoperative findings, and immediate postoperative variables were obtained. The timing and primary reason for unplanned postoperative office visits, phone calls/electronic messages, and emergency department visits were recorded for each patient.
results65 patients (34%) presented for an unplanned office visit within 90 days of surgery, with 11% requiring multiple visits. Common concerns included the appearance of the surgical site (39%), device appearance or function (38%), and pain (14%). Discharge with an opioid prescription was associated with an increased incidence of unscheduled postoperative visits. 58% of patients contacted the surgical office via phone or electronic health record. Common reasons for communication were clarification of postoperative instructions (24%), device concerns (23%), and pain (21%). Prior penile prosthesis surgery was associated with a decreased rate of communication. Discharge timing and a history of a chronic pain or psychiatric condition did not affect postoperative healthcare system engagement.
conclusionsWhile phone calls and messages following penile prosthesis placement are common, most patients can be managed with a single postoperative appointment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40327150What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.