ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Robotically assisted placement of a pubic ramus screw and an SI-S1 screw].
Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robotically equipped 3D hybrid operating room in spine and trauma surgery - updated experience in 359 patients and 2080 screws.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Retrograde posterior column acetabular screw: robotically assisted and CT-guided minimally invasive procedure.Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- [Robotically assisted and navigated pedicle screw placement at the subaxial cervical spine].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- [Robotically assisted and minimally invasive pedicle screw placement at the lumbar spine].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objective of surgeryThe aim of this operation is to stabilize the anterior pelvic ring fractures on both sides and the sacral fracture on the right using robotically assisted screw osteosynthesis and to restore the mobility of the patient. INDICATIONS: The indications arise from the patient's very severe pain, resulting immobility under conservative treatment measures and a fragility fracture of the pelvis grade II (FFP II). CONTRAINDICATIONS: Typical contraindications for this type of operation are the same as for conventional techniques (mainly infection and swelling). SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Performed in the 3D navigation hybrid operating theatre Robotic Suite with the following components: navigation unit "Curve Navigation System", movable robotic 3D cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) "Loop‑X", robotic arm "Cirq Arm System" and wall monitor "BUZZ" (Brainlab, Munich, Germany). The individual surgical steps are explained in the video online (English). FOLLOW-UP TREATMENT: Full weight bearing, pain medication according to the World Health Organization (WHO) stage scheme, physiotherapy after the first postoperative day. EVIDENCE: Navigated and robotically assisted techniques are mainly used on the spine. These techniques are also increasingly being used on the pelvis, whereby very high levels of accuracy can also be achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.