Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40327077›Full record

ArticleOperative Orthopadie und Traumatologie2025

[The art of cast wedging in children and adolescents].

Daniel Frühwirt, Kai Ziebarth

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniel FrühwirtAbteilung für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum St. Pölten, Dunantplatz 1, 3100, St. Pölten, Österreich. daniel.fruehwirt@stpoelten.lknoe.at.
Kai ZiebarthAbteilung Kinderorthopädie, Kinderchirurgische Universitätsklinik, Inselspital Bern, Freiburgstr., 3010, Bern, Schweiz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCorrection of pediatric fractures by cast wedging to achieve acceptable positioning for conservative fracture management. Efficient and convenient treatment to avoid invasive manipulation or hospitalization. INDICATIONS: Fractures of distal forearm shaft or distal metaphyseal forearm. Tibial shaft fractures from midshaft to distal metaphyseal region. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Proximal and middle forearm fractures. Complete dislocation. Articular fractures. Very young children (compliance problems). Open fractures. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Immediate cast application for fracture treatment as usual. After 8-10 days wedging of the cast at concavity of fracture site leads to gentle fracture reduction within a few days. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Depending on the age of the patient and location of the fracture, weekly visits to look for any discomfort or pain while cast treatment after wedging. Depending on the age of patient, duration of the cast is 4-6 weeks.

resultsA recent analysis of 199 fractures in Sankt Pölten (average age 8.9 years) showed low refracture rates. In only 2 cases did unsuccessful wedging lead to surgical treatment (proximal radius-elastic stable intramedullary nailing [ESIN], distal tibial metaphysis-K-wires). Furthermore, refracture after cast removal occurred in 4 out of a total of 78 greenstick fractures of the radius (refracture rate 5%, well below the usual figures reported in the literature). The treatment goal was achieved with cast wedging in 96% of the patient population.

Indexed as

Casts, SurgicalRadius FracturesTibial FracturesUlna FracturesAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeBone fracturesClosed fracture reductionForearmTibia fractureWedging

Identifiers

PMID40327077
PMCPMC12137507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.