ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025
[Medical ethical challenges of phage therapy-informed consent, study design and therapeutic trial].
Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Bacteriophage Science: A Comprehensive Narrative Review of Applications, Challenges, and Translational Opportunities.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Is a Bacteriophage Approach for Musculoskeletal Infection Management an Alternative to Conventional Therapy?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The antibiotics crisis is increasing interest in bacteriophages and related therapeutic approaches. The translation of phage therapy into clinical application faces various ethical challenges. These include the patient's informed consent based on patient information as well as open questions regarding an ethically sound study design. In addition, further ethical problems arise from the current situation of phage therapy in Germany with regard to equity of access. This article reflects on the three aspects of phage therapy mentioned above. The results show that phage therapy does not pose any requirements for patient information that could not be solved by adapting the information provided. Questions regarding an adapted study design arise against the background of the placebo dilemma, possible resistance to antibiotics and the expected small number of study participants. An attempt can be made to respond to these challenges by adapting the study design. As a result, the studies deviate from the gold standard, which is randomized, controlled and double-blind studies. A balance must be struck here between evidence requirements and the protection of study participants. From an ethical point of view, the protection of participants must be given greater weight. The current situation of phage therapy in Germany poses an ethical problem, as both the individualised therapeutic trial and the resulting medical tourism that can be observed stand in the way of the demand for fair access and distribution. In order to overcome this status, the magistral prescription represents a possible interim step until clarity has been gained about an appropriate study design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.