Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40327001›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2025

Eye-movement patterns for perceiving bistable figures.

Yi-Hsuan Hsu, Chien-Chung Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yi-Hsuan HsuDepartment of Psychology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chien-Chung ChenDepartment of Psychology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bistable figures can generate two different percepts alternating with each other. It is suggested that eye fixation plays an important role in bistable figure perception because it helps us selectively focus on certain image features. We tested how the shift of percept is related to the eye-fixation pattern and whether inhibition of return (IOR) plays a role in this process. IOR refers to the phenomenon where, after attention remains at the same image location for a period, the inhibition to the mechanisms supporting that location increases. Consequently, visual attention shifts to a new location, and reallocation to the original location is suppressed. We used an eye tracker to record the observers' eye movements during observation of the duck/rabbit figure and the Necker cube while recording their percept reversals. In Experiment 1, we showed there were indeed different eye fixation patterns for different percepts. Also, the fixation shifted across different regions that occurred before the percept reversal. In Experiment 2, we examined the influence of inward bias on the duck/rabbit figure and found that it had a significant effect on the first percept but that this effect diminished over time. In Experiment 3, a mask was added to the attended region to remove the local saliency. This manipulation increased the number of percept reversals and fixation shifts across different regions. That is, the change in local saliency can cause a fixation shift and thus reverse our perception. Our result shows that what we perceive depends on where we look.

Indexed as

AttentionEye MovementsFixation, OcularForm PerceptionPattern Recognition, VisualVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40327001
PMCPMC12061061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.