ArticleJournal of vision2025
Eye-movement patterns for perceiving bistable figures.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysis of Top-Down Perceptual Modulation Considering Eye Fixations Made on a Bistable Logo.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bistable figures can generate two different percepts alternating with each other. It is suggested that eye fixation plays an important role in bistable figure perception because it helps us selectively focus on certain image features. We tested how the shift of percept is related to the eye-fixation pattern and whether inhibition of return (IOR) plays a role in this process. IOR refers to the phenomenon where, after attention remains at the same image location for a period, the inhibition to the mechanisms supporting that location increases. Consequently, visual attention shifts to a new location, and reallocation to the original location is suppressed. We used an eye tracker to record the observers' eye movements during observation of the duck/rabbit figure and the Necker cube while recording their percept reversals. In Experiment 1, we showed there were indeed different eye fixation patterns for different percepts. Also, the fixation shifted across different regions that occurred before the percept reversal. In Experiment 2, we examined the influence of inward bias on the duck/rabbit figure and found that it had a significant effect on the first percept but that this effect diminished over time. In Experiment 3, a mask was added to the attended region to remove the local saliency. This manipulation increased the number of percept reversals and fixation shifts across different regions. That is, the change in local saliency can cause a fixation shift and thus reverse our perception. Our result shows that what we perceive depends on where we look.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.