Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40326776›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2025

Assessing the Perioperative Capacity in the Republic of Zambia in Preparation for the First Revision of the National Surgical Obstetric and Anesthesia Plan (NSOAP): A Rapid Survey Method.

Joshua Gazzetta, Emmanuel Malabo Makasa, Moses Mwale, Cyrus Phiri, Mwamba Josephine Chiteba Mulenga, Mutimba Bernard Mpabalwani, Lillian Mwape, Kennedy Lishimpi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joshua GazzettaDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia and Centre for Surgical Healthcare Research, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5303-3725
Emmanuel Malabo MakasaCentre for Surgical Healthcare Research, Department of Surgery, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.
Moses MwaleWorld Health Organization, Lusaka, Zambia.
Cyrus PhiriCentre for Surgical Healthcare Research, Department of Surgery, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.
Mwamba Josephine Chiteba MulengaCentre for Surgical Healthcare Research, Department of Surgery, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.
Mutimba Bernard MpabalwaniCentre for Surgical Healthcare Research, Department of Surgery, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.
Lillian MwapeCentre for Surgical Healthcare Research, Department of Surgery, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.
Kennedy LishimpiRepublic of Zambia, Ministry of Health, The Permanent Secretary, Lusaka, Zambia.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecognizing unmet surgical needs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has led to worldwide initiatives to scale-up surgical capacity. The Republic of Zambia is preparing for its first National Surgical Obstetric and Anesthesia Plan (NSOAP) revision and there is limited data on Zambia's surgical healthcare capacity. We aim to highlight Zambia's surgical healthcare capacity to inform the NSOAP revision and the method used for the rapid assessment.

methodsThe Emergency and Essential Surgical (Perioperative) Healthcare Health Facility Assessment Tool (ZAMSAT) was fashioned. ZAMSAT survey responses were used to provide a cross-sectional assessment of leveled healthcare facilities nationwide. The survey was distributed to 227 first-, second-, and third-level hospitals under the leadership of Zambia's Operating Theater Nurses Interest Group and the MOH. The WhatsApp messenger application was used for survey distribution and collection.

resultsData from 116 leveled facilities in all 10 provinces were captured for a survey response rate of 51.1%. A mix of public, private, and mission/nonprofit hospitals was included. The uninterrupted supply of electricity, oxygen, and clean water was found in less than 40% of all facilities. The overall ability to perform caesarean deliveries was 89%, but the ability to perform a laparotomy or open fracture management was significantly lower at 71% and 37%, respectively. Both the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist and pulse-oximetry use in the theater are consistently used more than 85% of the time. General doctors and anesthesia providers are responsible for the majority of intraoperative care in Zambia. Two-percent of facilities are using electronic records as their only means of medical record keeping. The most common research being performed is observational. Although 7% of facilities report a dedicated budget line for perioperative care, only 30% report the budget is adequate. Forty-percent of facilities have local committees dedicated to perioperative care and only 43% of facilities were aware of the NSOAP (2017-2021).

conclusionZAMSAT successfully quantified nationwide perioperative healthcare capacity data to inform the Republic of Zambia's first NSOAP revision. The assessment highlights important gaps in each NSOAP domain that may be addressed to advance perioperative healthcare in Zambia.

Indexed as

Perioperative CareCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesZambiaassessmentcapacityNSOAPperioperative

Identifiers

PMID40326776
PMCPMC12134188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.