ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
Bayesian estimation of allele-specific expression in the presence of phasing uncertainty.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Monoallelic Gene Expression: Stochastic or Clonal? From Detection to Mechanisms and Clinical Significance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Development of a Predictive Risk Model for Recurrence of Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Post-Tuberculosis Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationAllele-specific expression (ASE) analyses aim to detect imbalanced expression of maternal versus paternal copies of an autosomal gene. Such allelic imbalance can result from a variety of cis-acting causes, including disruptive mutations within one copy of a gene that impact the stability of transcripts, as well as regulatory variants outside the gene that impact transcription initiation. Current methods for ASE estimation suffer from a number of shortcomings, such as relying on only one variant within a gene, assuming perfect phasing information across multiple variants within a gene, or failing to account for alignment biases and possible genotyping errors.
resultsWe developed BEASTIE, a Bayesian hierarchical model designed for precise ASE quantification at the gene level, based on given genotypes and RNA-Seq data. BEASTIE addresses the complexities of allelic mapping bias, genotyping error, and phasing errors by incorporating empirical phasing error rates derived from Genome-in-a-Bottle individual NA12878. BEASTIE surpasses existing methods in accuracy, especially in scenarios with high phasing errors. This improvement is critical for identifying rare genetic variants often obscured by such errors. Through rigorous validation on simulated data and application to real data from the 1000 Genomes Project, we establish the robustness of BEASTIE. These findings underscore the value of BEASTIE in revealing patterns of ASE across gene sets and pathways. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The software is freely available from Github (https://github.com/x811zou/BEASTIE); and Zendo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15062124).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.