ArticlePediatric pulmonology2025
The Newborn Screening Experience of Caregivers of Children With Cystic Fibrosis in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
Article in Pediatric pulmonology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cystic Fibrosis Year in Review 2024.Pediatric pulmonology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere have been significant improvements in the health of infants and children with cystic fibrosis (CF) since universal newborn screening (NBS) was implemented in the United States (US). However, a significant proportion of infants with CF are not evaluated in a timely manner, and delays disproportionately affect children from minoritized racial/ethnic groups. The aim of this study was to understand experiences of NBS in caregivers of young children with CF in the United States.
methodsWe recruited caregivers of children (0-13 years) with CF through listservs and social media of CF organizations. The survey was administered online in 2023 and included questions about their recollections of their child's NBS and the process of getting a CF diagnosis.
resultsOf 383 caregiver respondents, 43% reported being informed that their child's race or ethnicity was a predictor of the chances of their child having CF. Most reported that after they were notified of a positive NBS test, the initial evaluation for CF was scheduled ≥ 4 days later, 45% reported a delay of ≥ 8 days, and 5% reporting a delay of ≥ 15 days. Most (91%) felt the initial evaluation for CF was thorough, but 35% reported delays in getting information about their child's diagnosis.
conclusionsCaregivers report delays in evaluation after a positive NBS. A significant proportion reported delays in receiving information about their child's diagnosis or being told that race or ethnicity were related to risk of CF. These findings show the need for education and practice changes in both primary care and CF center settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.