Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40326643›Full record

ReviewMolecular ecology resources2025

Designing Epigenetic Clocks for Wildlife Research.

Levi Newediuk, Evan S Richardson, Alyssa M Bohart, Amélie Roberto-Charron, Colin J Garroway, Meaghan J Jones

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular ecology resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Editorial 2026.Molecular ecology resources · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Estimating Polar Bear (Ecology and evolution · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Levi NewediukDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0719-9596
Evan S RichardsonEnvironment and Climate Change Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Alyssa M BohartDepartment of Environment, Government of Nunavut, Iqaluit, Nunavut, Canada.
Amélie Roberto-CharronDepartment of Environment, Government of Nunavut, Iqaluit, Nunavut, Canada.
Colin J GarrowayDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0955-0688
Meaghan J JonesDepartment of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Funding

Environment and Climate Change CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The applications of epigenetic clocks - statistical models that predict an individual's age based on DNA methylation patterns - are expanding in wildlife conservation and management. This growing interest highlights the need for field-specific design best practices. Here, we provide recommendations for two main applications of wildlife epigenetic clocks: estimating the unknown ages of individuals and assessing their biological ageing rates. Epigenetic clocks were originally developed to measure biological ageing rates of human tissues, which presents challenges for their adoption in wildlife research. Most notably, the estimated chronological ages of sampled wildlife can be unreliable, and sampling restrictions limit the number and variety of tissues with which epigenetic clocks can be constructed, reducing their accuracy. To address these challenges, we present a detailed workflow for designing, validating applying accurate wildlife epigenetic clocks. Using simulations and analyses applied to an extensive polar bear dataset from across the Canadian Arctic, we demonstrate that accurate epigenetic clocks for wildlife can be constructed and validated using a limited number of samples, accommodating projects with small budgets and sampling constraints. The concerns we address are critical for clock design, whether researchers or third-party service providers perform the bioinformatics. With our workflow and examples, we hope to support the accessible and widespread use of epigenetic clocks in wildlife conservation and management.

Indexed as

AgingAnimals, WildEpigenesis, GeneticEpigenomicsUrsidaeAnimalsArctic RegionsCanadaComputational BiologyConservation of Natural ResourcesDNA Methylationage estimationbiodiversity conservationbiomarkerDNA methylationepigenetic clockwildlife monitoring

Identifiers

PMID40326643
PMCPMC12415925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.