ArticleAnales del sistema sanitario de Navarra2025
[Effects of a personalised, adapted computerised cognitive stimulation programme versus stimulating leisure activities in younger and older adults with mild or subjective cognitive impairment. Protocol for a randomised controlled trial].
Article in Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Long-term maintenance of the emotional benefits of cognitive stimulation in early-stage cognitive impairment].Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra · 2026Trial
- [Differential effects of computerized cognitive stimulation versus stimulating leisure activities on mood and global cognition in adults with subjective and mild cognitive impairment: A randomized controlled trial].Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra · 2025Trial
- Comparing Adapted Small-Sided Team Sports and Aerobic Exercise with or without Cognitive Games: Effects on Fitness and Cognition in Older Men.Journal of sports science & medicine · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMild cognitive impairment represents a transitional stage between healthy aging and dementia, with subjective cognitive impairment being a key predictor of progression to dementia. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of a personalized computerized cognitive stimulation program with that of stimulating leisure activities in younger and older adults with mild or subjective cognitive impairment.
methodsParticipants aged = 50 with mild cognitive impairment, subjective cognitive impairment, or scores between 24 and 31 on the Spanish Mini-Mental State Examination were recruited. Exclusion criteria comprised living in residential care, use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, sensory impairments, agitation, or having received cognitive stimulation in the past 12 months. Fifty-nine community-dwelling individuals in Zaragoza, Spain, were randomly assigned to two interventions group or a control group. The first intervention group will receive personalized computerized cognitive stimulation for 30 minutes per day, five days per week, while the second intervention group will participate in two to five stimulating leisure activities. The intervention will last eight weeks. The control group will receive the usual care for the same duration. The primary outcome is the assessment of global cognition; secondary outcomes include memory, verbal fluency, activities of daily living, and mood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.