Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40326568›Full record

ArticleBiology open2025

Temporal integration and decision-making in crocodiles.

Naïs Caron Delbosc, Julie Thévenet, Nathalie Grosjean, Loïc Méès, Nicolas Boyer, Mélanie Schneider, Nicolas Grimault, Nicolas Mathevon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Naïs Caron DelboscENES Bioacoustics Research Lab, CRNL, CNRS, Inserm, University of Saint-Etienne, 42100 Saint-Etienne, France.ORCID 0009-0003-3606-5586
Julie ThévenetENES Bioacoustics Research Lab, CRNL, CNRS, Inserm, University of Saint-Etienne, 42100 Saint-Etienne, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1111-8955
Nathalie GrosjeanUniv Lyon, CNRS, École Centrale de Lyon, INSA Lyon, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, LMFA, UMR5509, 69134 Écully, CEDEX, France.
Loïc MéèsUniv Lyon, CNRS, École Centrale de Lyon, INSA Lyon, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, LMFA, UMR5509, 69134 Écully, CEDEX, France.
Nicolas BoyerENES Bioacoustics Research Lab, CRNL, CNRS, Inserm, University of Saint-Etienne, 42100 Saint-Etienne, France.
Mélanie SchneiderENES Bioacoustics Research Lab, CRNL, CNRS, Inserm, University of Saint-Etienne, 42100 Saint-Etienne, France.
Nicolas GrimaultÉquipe Cognition Auditive et Psychoacoustique/CRNL, CNRS, Inserm, University Lyon 1, 69500 Bron, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3586-4426
Nicolas MathevonENES Bioacoustics Research Lab, CRNL, CNRS, Inserm, University of Saint-Etienne, 42100 Saint-Etienne, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0219-6601

Funding

ENES Bioacoustics Research Lab, Université Jean Monnet, Saint-EtienneInstitut universitaire de FranceLabexLyon Center of Acoustics, ANR-10-LABX-60University of Saint-Etienne
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To make appropriate behavioural decisions, animals continuously process a flow of information provided by different sensory channels. Could temporality, i.e. the order in which independent stimuli are perceived, lead the animal to give greater importance to one stimulus than to another? Here we show that the decision of a crocodile to move preferentially towards the source of water surface waves than towards the source of an airborne sound is irrespective of the relative time of arrival of the sound and water vibrations to the animal, as long as the delay between these two stimuli does not exceed a few seconds. To test whether the late arrival of water waves - which travel more slowly than sound - could explain crocodiles' preference for the source of water waves, we controlled the relative timing of stimulus arrival within a time window of a few seconds. Our results reveal that crocodiles preferentially move towards the source of the water waves, whether they arrive after, at the same time as, or before the sound. This suggests that the temporal integration of information from different sensory channels can occur within a certain time window, where the behavioural decision-making remains independent of the arrival order of stimuli. The maximum delay between simultaneously evaluated stimuli probably depends on animal species and context.

Indexed as

Alligators and CrocodilesBehavior, AnimalDecision MakingAnimalsSoundTime FactorsCrocodilesDecision-makingSensory perceptionSoundTemporalityWater surface waves

Identifiers

PMID40326568
PMCPMC12079573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.