ArticleEFORT open reviews2025
Current status of Asian joint registries: a review.
Article in EFORT open reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-Dimensional Estimation of the Femoral Head Center From Trochanteric Landmarks in Japanese Female Patients With Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
- Protocol for Novel Perioperative Optimization of Obese Osteoarthritic Patients pending Total Knee Replacement with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (NPO-OOPS-TKR) : a pilot randomized controlled trial.Bone & joint open · 2026Article
- Review
- The Indian Joint Registry: Building Trust, Safety, and Excellence in Indian Orthopedics.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2025Article
- The Impact of Disease-Specific Care Certification on Total Medical Costs for Joint Replacement Surgeries.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Research Trends and Knowledge Evolution of Surgical Approaches in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Bibliometric Analysis.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A comprehensive overview of current Asian joint arthroplasty registries, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses and providing a case for establishing registries nationwide, is given. Pertinent information required for the future establishment and improvement of Asian joint arthroplasty registries is given. Six registries in Asia were identified, with three, Indian Joint Registry, Japanese Orthopaedic Association National Registry and Pakistan National Joint Registry having developed official websites and published annual reports. The majority of both hip and knee surgeries in India and Pakistan were carried out on men, in contrary to Japan, where the majority of knee surgeries were conducted in women. Osteoarthritis was the primary indication for knee surgery, whereas osteonecrosis was the main indication for hip surgery in India and Pakistan, compared to osteoarthritis in Japan. Many countries in Asia have attempted to report data on joint arthroplasties, though little information on nationwide registries is available, with three countries - Japan, India and Pakistan - having made their joint registry data available to the public.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.