Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40326529›Full record

ArticleEFORT open reviews2025

Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis.

E Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán, William J Ribbans, José M Olmo-Jiménez, Alberto D Delgado-Martínez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFORT open reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis (AAA) has been performed for 40 years for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. Along with open ankle arthrodesis (OAA) and total ankle replacement (TAR), it forms one arm of the triumvirate of commonly performed procedures for this condition. The aim of this article is to review the state of the art for AAA and compare outcomes with OAA and TAR. This narrative review of the literature traces the development of this technique through case series and systematic reviews. Traditional OAA techniques carry a nonunion rate of 11%, necessitating revision surgery in most cases. As individual and communal experience of AAA has grown, the range of pathology and deformity successfully corrected by this technique has developed. There is evidence that AAA offers greater and more rapid union rates, with reduced hospital stay and better long-term outcomes. However, the technique requires mature surgical skills and still carries a significant complication rate. No single procedure is suitable for all patients. AAA can be seen as the new gold standard for patients with isolated ankle osteoarthritis and no/minimal deformity, either within the talocrural joint or hindfoot or patients with systemic and/or local comorbidities that would benefit from minimal disturbance to the soft-tissue envelope. However, in older patients, the presence of concomitant hindfoot osteoarthritis or significant deformity, TAR and OAA remain valuable procedures in the foot and ankle surgeon's armamentarium.

Indexed as

anklearthroscopic arthrodesisosteoarthritisresults

Identifiers

PMID40326529
PMCPMC12061018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.