ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2025
Everyday Language and Cognitive Functioning in Late Life.
Article in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesLanguage deterioration is a marker of cognitive decline in late life. An emerging literature has examined features of language associated with executive functioning and working memory when older adults are cognitively healthy. This study aims to identify linguistic features that predict cognitive functioning in a sample of cognitively healthy individuals.
methodParticipants from the Daily Experiences and Well-being Study (DEWS; aged 65-89, N = 260) completed a battery of standard cognitive tests. They wore an Android device containing the Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR) app, which recorded ambient sound 30 seconds every 7 min for 5-6 days (N = 26,339 sound files with participant speech). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) software generated linguistic features from transcriptions of recorded speech. Machine learning models (random forest classifier) were trained with the linguistic features (n = 29) to predict cognitive functioning.
resultsPrincipal component analysis revealed that the cognitive domains fit a single factor. The random forest classifier achieved robust model performance (accuracy = 0.72, precision = 0.74, recall = 0.91, F1-score = 0.81, and area under curve = 0.73). Linguistic features most strongly associated with cognitive functioning included: first-person singular pronouns (with worse cognitive functioning), articles, words indicating differentiation, first-person plural pronouns, and words per sentence (with better cognitive functioning). DISCUSSION: Findings suggest that language processes are evident across multiple domains of cognitive functioning when older adults remain within a cognitively healthy range. Use of complex language may indicate optimal cognitive functioning, a topic worthy of future investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.