ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2025
Development and Validation of Mortality Prediction Models among Frail Participants in the UK Biobank Study.
Article in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIdentifying effective risk assessment strategies and prediction models for frail populations is crucial for precise mortality risk identification and improved patient management. This study aimed to evaluate whether prediction models incorporating survey data combined with biomarkers, physical measurements, or both could enhance mortality risk prediction in frail individuals than survey-only models.
methods15 754 frail participants aged 40-72 from the UK Biobank were included. We used Cox models to assess all-cause mortality risk and Light Gradient Boosting Machines for variable selection by sex. Performance was evaluated through discrimination, calibration, and reclassification.
resultsIn the survey-only models, we selected 24 predictors for males and 19 for females; age and number of treatments were the top predictors for both sexes. In the biomarker models, we selected 15 predictors for males and 24 for females. In the physical measurement models, we retained 24 predictors for males and 23 for females. The base models showed good discrimination: C-statistic was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.72-0.75) for males and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.72-0.76) for females in development, and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.65-0.75) for males and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.73-0.83) for females in validation. Although incorporating additional predictors led to some improvement in model performance, the overall enhancement was not substantial.
conclusionsSurvey-based models predicted mortality in frail individuals effectively, with only minor improvements from adding biomarkers or physical measurements. These findings highlighted the value of surveys in forecasting outcomes and informed personalized management strategies to improve health for the frail.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.