ArticleJournal of animal science2025
In vitro fermentation characteristics of acacia fiber using canine fecal inoculum.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Vitro Fermentation Characteristics of Dietary Fibers Using Fecal Inoculum from Dogs Consuming a Dried Brewers Yeast Product.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- In vitro fermentation characteristics of acacia fiber using feline fecal inoculum.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acacia fiber is a highly concentrated source of soluble fiber extracted from the natural resin of acacia trees. This fiber is frequently utilized in the pet food industry as a processing aid to improve texture and stability. The objective of this study was to evaluate the fermentation characteristics of acacia fiber, inulin, pectin (positive control), and cellulose (negative control) using an in vitro fermentation system and canine fecal inoculum. Triplicate samples of each fiber were fermented for 0, 6, 12, and 18 h. Blank-corrected data were analyzed using PROC GLIMMIX of SAS to evaluate the effects of fiber, time, and fiber × time interactions; significance was declared at P ≤ 0.05. Significant fiber × time interactions were observed for pH change, gas and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production, and microbiota populations. Pectin and inulin had greater (P < 0.01) gas production than acacia fiber and cellulose. Inulin had the greatest (P < 0.01) pH reduction, followed closely by pectin. Acacia fiber had a small reduction in pH, being lower (P < 0.01) than cellulose after 18 h. Pectin and inulin had greater (P < 0.01) acetate, propionate, butyrate, and total SCFA production than acacia fiber and cellulose. Acetate and total SCFA production were also greater (P < 0.01) in acacia fiber than in cellulose. Bacterial alpha diversity increased (P < 0.01) during acacia fiber fermentation but decreased (P < 0.01) during inulin fermentation. Beta diversity shifted over time and showed separate clustering of bacterial communities among the different fiber sources. The relative abundances of approximately 40 bacterial genera were affected by fiber × time interactions. Specifically, acacia fiber had a greater (P < 0.01) increase in Bacteroides, Faecalibacterium, and Ruminococcus torques group abundance than other fibers. Inulin had a greater (P < 0.01) increase in Prevotella, while pectin tubes had a greater (P < 0.01) increase in Bifidobacterium than other fibers. Overall, the results of this study suggest that acacia fiber is a moderately fermentable fiber, producing low levels of gas and SCFA, increasing bacterial richness and diversity, and modifying several bacterial taxa. Although these data suggest beneficial responses in vitro, research in live animals is needed to confirm potential benefits in dogs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.