ReviewCurrent reviews in clinical and experimental pharmacology2025
Nonopioid Drugs for Postoperative Pain: A Selection Governed by Choices of the Authors of Academic Articles.
Review in Current reviews in clinical and experimental pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intraoperative haemodynamic responses to opioid-free anaesthesia versus anaesthesia with fentanyl for laparoscopic cholecystectomy-a prospective observational pilot study.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Observational
- Global Trends and Insights Into Opioid Utilization for Postoperative Pain Management: A Bibliometric Analysis (2014-2024).Pain research & management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The opioid crisis has profoundly changed the interest in using nonopioid analgesics. This review identified nonopioid drugs receiving the most interest in the treatment of postoperative pain. Publication-based interest, which reflects the authors' choices of subjects for academic articles, was used to show the shifts in their interest. The authors' choices of a particular drug for an article's subject were regarded as reflective of the collective opinion of experts most knowledgeable on the subject. The frequency with which a drug was the topic of an article was measured with the use of specific bibliometric indices. They were employed to select nonopioid drugs for this review. These included acetaminophen, dexmedetomidine, dexamethasone, ketamine, gabapentin, ibuprofen, ketorolac, diclofenac, magnesium sulfate, clonidine, intravenous lidocaine, and meloxicam (in order of most to least bibliometric interest). Individual reviews on these agents described how the bibliometric indices characterized a drug. They also addressed the question of whether a nonopioid analgesic produced a marked opioid-sparing effect. Information relative to this question was presented via the results of meta-analyses with emphasis on the possible reduction of opioid-related side effects. Overall, nonopioid drugs demonstrating the largest popularity among authors and continuous interest growth in 2018-2022 include acetaminophen, dexmedetomidine, dexamethasone, and ibuprofen. The relevant meta-analyses show that nonopioids, administered as components of multimodal analgesia, provided the opioid-sparing effect; they also show that the most common change in the opioid-related side effects was a lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.