Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40325950›Full record

ArticleSubstance use & misuse2025

Temporal and Thematic Analysis of Promotional Waterpipe-Related Posts on Twitter/X in the US.

Puhua Ye, Mengwei Wu, Yiwei Han, Yuka Shimazaki, Jennifer Cornacchione Ross, Erin L Sutfin, Dongmei Li, Zidian Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance use & misuse, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Puhua YeGoergen Institute for Data Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
Mengwei WuGoergen Institute for Data Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
Yiwei HanGoergen Institute for Data Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
Yuka ShimazakiGoergen Institute for Data Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
Jennifer Cornacchione RossDepartment of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Erin L SutfinDepartment of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Dongmei LiDepartment of Clinical and Translational Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
Zidian XieDepartment of Clinical and Translational Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5149-7710

Funding

WNY Center for Research on Flavored Tobacco Products (CRoFT)U54CA228110 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI GONIEWICZ, MACIEJ LUKASZ · 2018 to 2022
$19.8M
Artificial Intelligence for effective communication to promote vaping cessation on social mediaR01CA285482 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Dongmei Li · 2024 to 2026
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA285482NCI NIH HHS U54 CA228110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWaterpipe tobacco smoking (WTS), also known as hookah, shisha, or narghile, is particularly popular among young people in the United States (US). WTS poses serious health risks similar to those of cigarette smoking.

methodsUsing the Twitter/X streaming API (Application Programming Interface), we collected 4,853,562 tweets between March 9, 2021, and March 14, 2023, using waterpipe-related keywords, such as "hookah" and "waterpipe." After geographical filtering to identify tweets from the US and keyword filtering for the promotional content, we identified 23,803 promotional waterpipe-related tweets. We examined trends in the posting time of these promotional waterpipe-related tweets and identified prevalent topics from these tweets using the BERTopic (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) modeling.

resultsThe number of promotional waterpipe-related tweets showed an overall decreasing trend during the study period. The posting of promotional waterpipe-related tweets was more active later in the day. Major topics in the promotional tweets included "Promotion from hookah lounges and online hookah business" (63.97%, 15,227/23,803), "promoting hookah parties and events" (32.26%, 7,679/23,803), and "promoting engineered and durable hookah products" (3.77%, 897/23,803). Twitter/X accounts posting waterpipe-related promotional content have substantial variations in the number of relevant tweets (mean = 2.28, SD = 12.22) and followers (mean = 5,937, SD = 76,770).

conclusionsThis study demonstrates a significant social media activity in promoting waterpipe tobacco smoking. Our findings underscore the urgent need to regulate the promotional content of WTS on social media and promote public health education messages on social media to counteract the promotion of WTS.

Indexed as

Social MediaWater Pipe SmokingHumansUnited StatesBERTopicHookahTwitterWaterpipe

Identifiers

PMID40325950
PMCPMC12685281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.