ArticleStudies in family planning2025
Reproductive Autonomy in Fertility Research in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Scoping Review.
Article in Studies in family planning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association between male absence and women's reproductive autonomy in sub-Saharan Africa: A cross-sectional analysis of Demographic and Health Survey Data.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fertility research in sub-Saharan Africa regularly indicates the need to increase women's reproductive autonomy. However, individual, female-focused conceptualizations of reproductive autonomy tend to neglect the power dynamics both internal and external to couples and other intimate relationships that shape a woman's reproductive autonomy. Furthermore, they disregard the reproductive autonomy of men and other subpopulations and partners in intimate relationships. To identify gaps and evaluate the applicability of the concept, this scoping review clarifies how reproductive autonomy has been assessed and applied in fertility research in sub-Saharan Africa. Eligible for inclusion were empirical peer-reviewed publications, including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research, published since 1994. Out of 1568 articles screened, 18 met the inclusion criteria. Most publications were quantitative in nature and focused mainly on the reproductive autonomy of women. Our key finding is that the reproductive autonomy of partners in intimate relationships, and of women in particular, is restricted at the community level in order to preserve the status quo of social power structures in society. In line with a reproductive justice approach, more research should focus on the reproductive autonomy of vulnerable and understudied populations as well as on the interpersonal and contextual dynamics that suppress reproductive autonomy in communal settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.