Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40325843›Full record

SynthesisClinical psychology & psychotherapy

Dropout in Psychotherapy for Personality Disorders: A Systematic Review of Predictors.

Francesca De Salve, Chiara Rossi, Elena Gioacchini, Irene Messina, Osmano Oasi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical psychology & psychotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Francesca De SalveDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9784-2914
Chiara RossiDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3570-2710
Elena GioacchiniDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.
Irene MessinaFaculty of Social and Communication Sciences, Universitas Mercatorum, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5720-5782
Osmano OasiDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2134-397X

Funding

Italian Ministry of University and Research-National Recovery and Resilience Plan 2022 J53D23017280001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDropout in psychotherapy for personality disorders is a major challenge, affecting treatment efficacy and mental health care delivery. Influenced by patient characteristics, therapist factors and treatment dynamics, dropout remains prevalent. This systematic review identifies predictors of psychotherapy dropout in individuals with personality disorders to inform strategies that enhance treatment engagement.

methodA systematic search in PsycINFO, PubMed and Scopus identified 22 studies from 1976 articles. Inclusion criteria required DSM/ICD-based personality disorder assessments and dropout predictors in psychotherapy. Non-English or non-peer-reviewed studies were excluded. Screening followed PRISMA guidelines using Rayyan, and study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).

resultsDropout rates ranged from 10.4% to 58%, depending on treatment modality and patient characteristics. Younger age, comorbid substance use disorders, emotional dysregulation, distress tolerance difficulties, childhood emotional abuse, therapist turnover and low motivation were significant predictors of dropout. Conversely, strong therapeutic alliances, mindfulness-based skills and engagement in phone coaching were associated with improved retention. Other relevant factors included low reflective functioning, lower education levels and socio-economic adversity, such as receiving disability benefits. Only one study identified low reflective functioning as a dropout predictor. Systemic factors, including treatment organization and care coordination, also played a crucial role.

conclusionsAddressing dropout requires early engagement strategies, therapist continuity and treatment flexibility. Enhancing therapeutic alliance and reflective functioning may be particularly effective in reducing dropout. Systemic improvements, such as better care coordination and accessibility, are crucial for sustaining engagement and improving psychotherapy outcomes for individuals with personality disorders. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO number: CRD42024509283.

Indexed as

Patient DropoutsPersonality DisordersPsychotherapyHumansdropoutpersonality disorderspsychotherapyreflective functioningtherapeutic alliance

Identifiers

PMID40325843
PMCPMC12053075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.