ReviewThe New phytologist2025
Simple sequence repeats and their expansions: role in plant development, environmental response and adaptation.
Review in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization of Chromosomal Structural Polymorphism inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cytogenetic Analysis of Altitude-Associated Chromosome Variations inEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Identification and Development of Pathogen- and Pest-Specific Defense-Resistance-Associated SSR Marker Candidates Assisted by Machine Learning and Discovery of Putative QTL Hotspots inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The evolution of tandem repeat sequences under partial selfing and different modes of selection.Heredity · 2026Article
- Genetic Insights into the Economic Toll of Cell Line Misidentification: A Comprehensive Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Satellite DNA Genomics: The Ongoing Story.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Mutations of short tandem repeats explain abundant trait heritability in Arabidopsis.Genome biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Repetitive DNA is a feature of all organisms, ranging from archaea and plants to humans. DNA repeats can be seen both in coding and in noncoding regions of the genome. Due to the recurring nature of the sequences, simple DNA repeats tend to be more prone to errors during replication and repair, resulting in variability in their unit length. This feature of simple sequence repeats led to their use as molecular markers for mapping traits in diverse organisms. Advances in genomics, and the ever-reducing costs of genome sequencing have empowered us to assess the functional impacts of DNA repeats. The variability in repeat lengths can cause phenotypic differences depending on where they are present in the genome. Variability in the repeat length in coding regions of genes results in poly amino acid stretches that appear to interfere with protein function, including the perturbation of protein-protein interactions with diverse phenotypic impacts. These are often common allelic variations that can significantly impact evolutionary dynamics. In extreme situations, repeats can undergo massive expansions and appear as outliers. Repeat expansions underlie several genetic defects in plants to diseases in humans. This review systematically analyses tandem DNA repeats in plants, their role in development and environmental response and adaptation in plants. We identify and synthesise emerging themes, differentiate repeat length variability and repeat expansions, and argue that many repeat-associated phenotypes in plants are yet to be discovered. We emphasise the underexplored nature and immense potential of this area of research, particularly in plants, and suggest ways in which this can be achieved and how it might contribute to evolution and agricultural productivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.