ArticleJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2025
Healthcare Professionals' Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Toward Providing Artificial Nutrition and Hydration for Patients With Terminal Cancer.
Article in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDecisions related to artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) provision for patients with terminal cancer are a complex topic that can affect the patients' quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to investigate the knowledge, attitudes and practices of healthcare professionals (HCPs) in South Africa concerning the provision of ANH for patients with terminal cancer.
methodsThis descriptive, cross-sectional study with an analytical component, involved doctors, nurses and dietitians experienced in caring for patients with terminal cancer. Data were collected via an electronic platform (n = 151), utilising a validated questionnaire with close-ended questions. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica Version 14.0, with p < 0.05 indicating statistical significance.
resultsNotable disparities were observed in HCPs' knowledge, attitudes and practices related to ANH provision. Participants demonstrated a high level of knowledge about palliative care (PC) (92%) but scored lower for ANH provision (56%). Most participants were aware of the burdens associated with ANH provision (mean score: 4.1 ± 0.7 [5-point Likert scale]), yet optimism emerged regarding its perceived psychological benefits. Factors such as patient autonomy (4.5 ± 0.8) and communication between the medical team and patients (4.4 ± 1.0) appeared to influence HCPs' practices. Furthermore, a notable difference was observed in knowledge scores and attitudes based on certain socio-demographic variables.
conclusionThis study suggests that HCPs have inadequate knowledge about, and contradictory attitudes toward, ANH provision in patients with terminal cancer. The study highlights the need for targeted education on terminal care, thereby informing efforts to improve the overall quality of care of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.