ReviewCurrent topics in medicinal chemistry2025
Elucidating the Pivotal Neuroprotective Mechanisms and Therapeutic Variants of Erythropoietin in Neonatal Brain Injury.
Review in Current topics in medicinal chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neonatal brain injury (NBI) encompasses a variety of neurological acquired conditions affecting newborns. These conditions include hypoxia-ischemia, hyperoxic, periventricular leukomalacia, intrauterine infection, as well as perinatal cerebral hemorrhage. Each year, thousands of babies are born with signs of brain injury. It is estimated that two-thirds of these newborn infants with brain injury would either die or survive with mild to severe neurologic sequelae, largely due to the absence of no widely accepted treatment methods. Erythropoietin (Epo) is a humoral intermediary associated with the maturation as well as the proliferation of erythroid progenitor cells. Systematic administration of Epo triggers the elevation of Epo levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) extracts, which means that Epo is capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier into the CSF. It has been reported that Epo treatment enhances the brain's network connectivity, improving local information transmission and promoting a shift toward a more integrated and consistent network architecture. This, in turn, augments both local and global connectivity efficiency. Exogenous Epo was found to be capable of regulating neurogenesis. Moreover, Epo was also reported to be associated with the inhibition of demyelination of axons, as well as the production of myelin-derived inhibitory proteins, which are inhibitory factors involved in axonal extension. Administration of recombinant human erythropoietin in neonatal rats provided neuroprotection against hyperoxiainduced oxidative stress. Furthermore, Epo administration during the neonatal period was shown to reverse molecular alterations associated with impaired development of the potassium-chloride cotransporter isoform 2 (KCC2), as well as deficits related to preterm birth during the postnatal period. Moreover, Epo was capable of blocking microglial stimulation, decreasing phagocytosis in vitro, as well as inhibiting the generation of inflammatory cytokines in vitro as well as in vivo. Thus, Epo via EpoR is able to influence brain connectivity, synaptogenesis, neurite repair, oxygeninduced brain injury, potassium chloride co-transporters, and inflammation via key signaling pathways to induce therapeutic as well as neuroprotection in NBI. Thus, Epo is a very promising neuroprotective as well as a therapeutic agent in the treatment of NBI. This review aimed to explore the neuroprotective and therapeutic mechanisms of Epo in NBI, as well as the potential of Epo variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40325536What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.