Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40325515›Full record

ReviewClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2025

Dosage Optimization of Pediatric Oncology Products: Our Patients Deserve Better.

Kristin M Wessel, Nicole Drezner, Stacy S Shord, Mirat Shah, Marc R Theoret, Martha Donoghue

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kristin M WesselCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0009-0000-8776-1969
Nicole DreznerCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-6299-9823
Stacy S ShordCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0009-0000-9497-1171
Mirat ShahCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-0052-9978
Marc R TheoretCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-4973-5297
Martha DonoghueCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-4493-6399

Funding

Intramural FDA HHS FD999999U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite survival gains for many pediatric cancers since the 1970s, cancer remains the leading cause of death by disease for children and adolescents in the United States. Survivors of pediatric cancer often experience acute and long-term toxicities resulting in diminished quality of life and reduced life expectancy. Thus, development of new therapies that offer a better balance between efficacy and safety remains an urgent unmet need. Dose-finding trials for pediatric oncology products have traditionally focused on identifying the maximum tolerated dose based on evaluation of acute, dose-limiting toxicities. However, oncology drug development has largely shifted from cytotoxic chemotherapies to targeted therapies such as kinase inhibitors, mAbs, antibody-drug conjugates, and cellular products, which often have different dose-response relationships for efficacy and safety and are sometimes administered on a chronic basis. These differences between cytotoxic chemotherapies and newer targeted therapies necessitate adoption of new, tailored approaches to identify the recommended dosage for oncology products in pediatric patients. The FDA Oncology Center of Excellence's Project Optimus is working to help develop such approaches, and an FDA guidance containing recommendations for optimizing the dosage of oncology products was finalized in 2024. Some members of the pediatric oncology community have expressed concerns about the potential impact of ongoing dosage optimization efforts on development of new treatments for pediatric cancers. Herein, we clarify the FDA's perspectives on dosage optimization in pediatric oncology and affirm our commitment to collaborating with stakeholders to expedite development of more effective, better-tolerated drugs and biologics for pediatric patients with cancer.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsAdolescentChildDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug DevelopmentHumansMaximum Tolerated DoseMedical OncologyQuality of LifeUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID40325515
PMCPMC12213127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.