Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40325471›Full record

ReviewClinical epigenetics2025

Recent advances on gene-related DNA methylation in cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment: a clinical perspective.

Alessandro Lavoro, Daria Ricci, Giuseppe Gattuso, Federica Longo, Graziana Spoto, Anastasia Cristina Venera Vitale, Maria Chiara Giuliana, Luca Falzone, Massimo Libra, Saverio Candido

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical epigenetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Epigenetic alterations in head and neck cancer: a brief update.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alessandro LavoroDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Daria RicciDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Giuseppe GattusoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Federica LongoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Graziana SpotoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Anastasia Cristina Venera VitaleDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Maria Chiara GiulianaDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Luca FalzoneDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy. luca.falzone@unict.it.
Massimo LibraDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Saverio CandidoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy.

Funding

European Union - NextGenerationEU through the Italian Ministry of University and Research under PNRR M4C2-Action 1.4-Call "Potenziamento strutture di ricerca e creazione di "campioni nazionali di R&S"-Project "National Center for Gene Therapy and Drugs based on RNA Technology" (CN00000041) CUP: E63C22000950006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in screening programs and the development of innovative therapeutic strategies have significantly improved the clinical outcomes of cancer patients. However, many patients still experience treatment failure, primarily due to inherent or acquired drug resistance mechanisms. This challenge underscores the urgent need for novel therapeutic targets for the effective treatment of malignancies, as well as cancer-specific biomarkers to enhance early diagnosis and guide interventions. Epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation, have recently garnered growing interest as key regulators of gene expression under both physiological and pathological conditions. Although epigenetic dysregulations are reliable tumor hallmarks, DNA methylation is still not routinely integrated into clinical practice, highlighting the need for further research to translate preclinical findings from the bench to the bedside. On these bases, the present review aims to illustrate the state of the art regarding the role of DNA methylation in cancer, describing the technologies currently available for DNA methylation profiling. Furthermore, the latest evidence on the application of DNA methylation hotspots in cancer diagnosis and prognosis, as well as the impact of epidrugs in cancer care, is discussed to provide a comprehensive overview of the potential clinical relevance of DNA methylation in advancing personalized medicine.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationNeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorEpigenesis, GeneticHumansPrecision MedicinePrognosisBiomarkers, Tumor5-AzacytidineBiomarkerCancerCRISPR-Cas9DecitabineDifferential methylated regionDNA methylationEpidrugsEpigeneticsTherapeutic target

Identifiers

PMID40325471
PMCPMC12054201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.