Trial reportBMC oral health2025
Digital versus conventional techniques for construction of mandibular implant retained overdenture.
Trial report in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06139003 (Evaluation of Digital Versus Conventional Techniques for Construction of Mandibular Implant Retained Overdenture), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of Digital Versus Conventional Techniques for Construction of Mandibular Implant Retained Overdenture
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peri-implant soft tissue health and denture base adaptation of CAD/CAM milled versus 3D-printed implant-assisted mandibular overdentures: one-year randomized clinical trial.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Digital Dentistry in Clinical Practice: A Scoping Review of Current Capabilities and Future Directions.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate two different construction techniques (conventional and 3D-printed techniques) for two implant-retained complete mandibular overdentures regarding mechanical wear of the occlusal surface using 3D digital analysis and occlusion force distribution using the digital occlusal analysis system (Occlusense).
methodsTwenty patients were selected for this study from the prosthetic department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University. Each patient received two implants in the mandibular canine areas with locator attachments to retain the overdentures. According to the overdenture construction technique, all patients were randomly divided into two equal groups: the conventional heat polymerized overdenture group and the 3D-printed overdenture group. The mandibular overdentures were compared and evaluated immediately and after 12 months of insertion regarding mechanical wear of the occlusal surface using 3D digital analysis and occlusal force distribution using a digital occlusal analysis system (Occlusense).
results3d printed group showed significantly higher occlusal surface wear than conventional group after twelve months (T12) with a p value ≤ 0.05. 3d printed group showed significantly more occlusal force distribution than conventional group with a p value ≤ 0.05. Also, there was a significant difference in occlusal force distribution with advance of time for each group, with a p value ≤ 0.05 level of significance.
conclusionWithin the limitations of this study, it was shown that implant overdentures constructed by 3D-printing techniques offer a promising results in distribution of occlusal forces for achieving occlusal equilibration. However, in term of wear resistance more developments need to be done to improve material properties.
trial registrationThe study was approved by the local ethical committee of the Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University (No. A02060922) (6/9/2022) and retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT06139003) (16/11/2023).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.